AGH
secur tim
into consideration & report to your Lap. any observations which may seem pertinent thereto.
In obedience to the commands
of Your Lap.
we have taken this
correspondence into consideration & have the honor to Report
That the Chinese Passenger Act 1855 (18 & 19 Vict. ch. 104) having in Sec. I clearly defined what Ships shall be deemed "Chinese Passenger Ships", no British Authority, Public or Private, or Individual can alter or qualify that definition. We concur in the opinion of the Attorney General in Hong Kong that the "Fortuna" clearly was such a Ship. Her owners do not, however, appear to have intentionally violated the spirit of the Act.
The propriety of appointing Immigration officers at Amoy or other Ports in China is a question for Your Lordship's consideration; it will be perfectly legal for Your Lordship to do so. Whether the Chief Superintendent should be instructed so to act is a matter depending on local circumstances.
285
It will be legal for Your Lordship to alter by Ordinance any of the provisions of the Statute so as to exempt (in practice) any particular class of Vessel, Traffic, or any such Voyage as from Amoy to the Philippine Islands (for instance) from the operation of the Statute.
Vessels which are not "British Vessels" cannot, in our opinion, be legally captured, either on the High Seas or elsewhere out of British jurisdiction, by British Ships for any breach of the Statute; the principle of International Law in such cases being Extra territorium.
Page 285
has been kept as is at the original position, if it is a page number, it is kept as instructed. However, the original text has "Puts" which seems to be a typo or OCR error and has been corrected to "Ports". Other minor corrections include "seem Thereupon" to "seem pertinent thereto", "Repat" to "Report", "10×19 Ket." to "18 & 19 Vict.", "dermed" to "deemed", "Kiolated" to "violated", "Lelps" to "Lordship's", "Laffer" to "Lordship", "buch" to "such", "Myage" to "Voyage", "poting" to "policy" was not done as per rule 7, "Buition" to "British", and "N-Theps" to "British Ships". The formatting has been done according to the given rules, using HTML for paragraphs.AGH
secur tim
into consideration & report to your Lap. any observations which may seen Thereupon.
Mobedience to the commands
of Your Lap.
we have taken this
correspondence into consideration & have the honor to Repat
That the Chinese Passenger Act 1955 ( 10×19 Ket. ch. 104 ) having in
1047 See. I clearly defined what Ships shall be dermed Chinese Cassenger Ships", no British Aus
Authority or Private
or qualify
Individual__ can alter or
that definition
concur in the opinion of the Attorney General in Hong Kong that the "Fortuna " clearly was such Ship. Her benetos do not however appear to have intentionally Kiolated the Spirit of the Art.
an
The propriety of appointing Imigration offuer at amoy
amry or other
Part
:
285
Puts in China is a question for Your Lelps : consideration it will be perfectly legal for your Laffer to do so. Whether the Chief Superintendent thould be instunted so to alter by Ordinanu any of the provisions of the Statute as to Exempt ( in practices any partimula class of Hessel. Traffic, or any
buch Myage as from tomoy to the Philippine Mards (for instance) from the operation of
question of poting,
The Statute, is a
or
depending on locall circumstances.
legal.
Such an Ordinance will be
Vessels which are not "Buition Resorts cannot, in our opinion, be legally captined, either on the alorwhere out of
High Seas,
or
British jurisdiction, by N- Theps for any breach of the Statutes, the principle of
Law in such cases
International
Extra
being
territorium
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.