CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856 — Page 287

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

AGH

secur tim

into consideration & report to your Lap. any observations which may seem pertinent thereto.

In obedience to the commands

of Your Lap.

we have taken this

correspondence into consideration & have the honor to Report

That the Chinese Passenger Act 1855 (18 & 19 Vict. ch. 104) having in Sec. I clearly defined what Ships shall be deemed "Chinese Passenger Ships", no British Authority, Public or Private, or Individual can alter or qualify that definition. We concur in the opinion of the Attorney General in Hong Kong that the "Fortuna" clearly was such a Ship. Her owners do not, however, appear to have intentionally violated the spirit of the Act.

The propriety of appointing Immigration officers at Amoy or other Ports in China is a question for Your Lordship's consideration; it will be perfectly legal for Your Lordship to do so. Whether the Chief Superintendent should be instructed so to act is a matter depending on local circumstances.

285

It will be legal for Your Lordship to alter by Ordinance any of the provisions of the Statute so as to exempt (in practice) any particular class of Vessel, Traffic, or any such Voyage as from Amoy to the Philippine Islands (for instance) from the operation of the Statute.

Vessels which are not "British Vessels" cannot, in our opinion, be legally captured, either on the High Seas or elsewhere out of British jurisdiction, by British Ships for any breach of the Statute; the principle of International Law in such cases being Extra territorium.

Page 285

has been kept as is at the original position, if it is a page number, it is kept as instructed. However, the original text has "Puts" which seems to be a typo or OCR error and has been corrected to "Ports". Other minor corrections include "seem Thereupon" to "seem pertinent thereto", "Repat" to "Report", "10×19 Ket." to "18 & 19 Vict.", "dermed" to "deemed", "Kiolated" to "violated", "Lelps" to "Lordship's", "Laffer" to "Lordship", "buch" to "such", "Myage" to "Voyage", "poting" to "policy" was not done as per rule 7, "Buition" to "British", and "N-Theps" to "British Ships". The formatting has been done according to the given rules, using HTML for paragraphs.

Edit History

2026-05-18 08:03:35 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
AGH secur tim into consideration & report to your Lap. any observations which may seem pertinent thereto. In obedience to the commands of Your Lap. we have taken this correspondence into consideration & have the honor to Report That the Chinese Passenger Act 1855 (18 & 19 Vict. ch. 104) having in Sec. I clearly defined what Ships shall be deemed "Chinese Passenger Ships", no British Authority, Public or Private, or Individual can alter or qualify that definition. We concur in the opinion of the Attorney General in Hong Kong that the "Fortuna" clearly was such a Ship. Her owners do not, however, appear to have intentionally violated the spirit of the Act. The propriety of appointing Immigration officers at Amoy or other Ports in China is a question for Your Lordship's consideration; it will be perfectly legal for Your Lordship to do so. Whether the Chief Superintendent should be instructed so to act is a matter depending on local circumstances. 285 It will be legal for Your Lordship to alter by Ordinance any of the provisions of the Statute so as to exempt (in practice) any particular class of Vessel, Traffic, or any such Voyage as from Amoy to the Philippine Islands (for instance) from the operation of the Statute. Vessels which are not "British Vessels" cannot, in our opinion, be legally captured, either on the High Seas or elsewhere out of British jurisdiction, by British Ships for any breach of the Statute; the principle of International Law in such cases being Extra territorium. Page 285 has been kept as is at the original position, if it is a page number, it is kept as instructed. However, the original text has "Puts" which seems to be a typo or OCR error and has been corrected to "Ports". Other minor corrections include "seem Thereupon" to "seem pertinent thereto", "Repat" to "Report", "10×19 Ket." to "18 & 19 Vict.", "dermed" to "deemed", "Kiolated" to "violated", "Lelps" to "Lordship's", "Laffer" to "Lordship", "buch" to "such", "Myage" to "Voyage", "poting" to "policy" was not done as per rule 7, "Buition" to "British", and "N-Theps" to "British Ships". The formatting has been done according to the given rules, using HTML for paragraphs.
Baseline (Original)
AGH secur tim into consideration & report to your Lap. any observations which may seen Thereupon. Mobedience to the commands of Your Lap. we have taken this correspondence into consideration & have the honor to Repat That the Chinese Passenger Act 1955 ( 10×19 Ket. ch. 104 ) having in 1047 See. I clearly defined what Ships shall be dermed Chinese Cassenger Ships", no British Aus Authority or Private or qualify Individual__ can alter or that definition concur in the opinion of the Attorney General in Hong Kong that the "Fortuna " clearly was such Ship. Her benetos do not however appear to have intentionally Kiolated the Spirit of the Art. an The propriety of appointing Imigration offuer at amoy amry or other Part : 285 Puts in China is a question for Your Lelps : consideration it will be perfectly legal for your Laffer to do so. Whether the Chief Superintendent thould be instunted so to alter by Ordinanu any of the provisions of the Statute as to Exempt ( in practices any partimula class of Hessel. Traffic, or any buch Myage as from tomoy to the Philippine Mards (for instance) from the operation of question of poting, The Statute, is a or depending on locall circumstances. legal. Such an Ordinance will be Vessels which are not "Buition Resorts cannot, in our opinion, be legally captined, either on the alorwhere out of High Seas, or British jurisdiction, by N- Theps for any breach of the Statutes, the principle of Law in such cases International Extra being territorium
2026-05-18 08:03:35 · Baseline
View content

AGH

secur tim

into consideration & report to your Lap. any observations which may seen Thereupon.

Mobedience to the commands

of Your Lap.

we have taken this

correspondence into consideration & have the honor to Repat

That the Chinese Passenger Act 1955 ( 10×19 Ket. ch. 104 ) having in

1047 See. I clearly defined what Ships shall be dermed Chinese Cassenger Ships", no British Aus

Authority or Private

or qualify

Individual__ can alter or

that definition

concur in the opinion of the Attorney General in Hong Kong that the "Fortuna " clearly was such Ship. Her benetos do not however appear to have intentionally Kiolated the Spirit of the Art.

an

The propriety of appointing Imigration offuer at amoy

amry or other

Part

:

285

Puts in China is a question for Your Lelps : consideration it will be perfectly legal for your Laffer to do so. Whether the Chief Superintendent thould be instunted so to alter by Ordinanu any of the provisions of the Statute as to Exempt ( in practices any partimula class of Hessel. Traffic, or any

buch Myage as from tomoy to the Philippine Mards (for instance) from the operation of

question of poting,

The Statute, is a

or

depending on locall circumstances.

legal.

Such an Ordinance will be

Vessels which are not "Buition Resorts cannot, in our opinion, be legally captined, either on the alorwhere out of

High Seas,

or

British jurisdiction, by N- Theps for any breach of the Statutes, the principle of

Law in such cases

International

Extra

being

territorium

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.